A central pillar of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's theology is the belief that Jesus survived the crucifixion, travelled, died a natural death, and was buried here on earth. However, tracking the exact location of this grave through his writings reveals a geographical timeline that kept shifting. Long before he settled on his famous claim that Jesus is buried in Srinagar, Kashmir, his earlier books confidently placed the tomb in entirely different countries. Let's look at how the location of the grave evolved over the years.
1891: Buried in Galilee
View Urdu Transliteration
"Yeh to sach hai ke Masih apne watan Galeel mein ja kar faut ho gaya. Lekin yeh hargiz sach nahi ke wohi jism jo dafan ho chuka tha phir zinda ho gaya."
Translation:
"It is true that the Messiah went to his homeland Galilee and passed away. But it is certainly not true that the very body which had been buried came back to life."- (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, p. 535, Izala Auham)
1894: The Grave in Al-Quds (Jerusalem)
Just three years after stating Jesus died in his homeland of Galilee, the location shifted. In his 1894 book Itmam-ul-Hujjah, Ghulam Ahmad relocated the grave to the broader region of Bilad al-Sham (Greater Syria). To back up this new geographical claim, he provided witness testimony from a resident of Tripoli, challenging anyone to prove the tomb was a forgery.
View Urdu Transliteration
"Hum zyada safai ke liye is jagah hashiyah mein akhweem hubbi fillah Sayyid Maulvi Muhammad Al-Saeedi Trablusi ki shahadat darj karte hain aur woh Trablus bilad-e-Shaam ke rehne wale hain aur inhin ki hudood mein Hazrat Isa alaihis-salam ki qabar hai aur agar kaho keh woh qabar jaali hai to is jaal ka saboot dena chahiye. Aur sabit karna chahiye keh kis waqt yeh jaal banaya gaya hai."
Translation:
"For greater clarity, we record here in the footnote the testimony of our brother in God, Syed Maulvi Muhammad Al-Saeedi Trablusi. He is a resident of Tripoli in the lands of Syria, and it is within his region that the grave of Hazrat Jesus (peace be upon him) is located. And if you say that this grave is fake, then proof of this fabrication must be provided, and it must be proven at what time this forgery was made."- (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 8, pp. 296-297, Itmam-ul-Hujjah)
Below is the official English translation of the same passage:
"To elaborate, I will reproduce here in a footnote the testimony of my brother-in-faith, Sayyid Maulawi Muhammad as-Sa‘idi Tarabulusi. He lives in Tripoli, the Levant and the tomb of Jesus, peace be on him, is found within its boundaries. If you say it is a false tomb then you should prove it. And also you should prove when this forgery was made."
- (The Conclusive Argument, pp. 64-67, English translation of Itmam-ul-Hujjah)
Having established the broader region of Greater Syria, a few pages later in the very same book he narrows down the geographical claim. He pinpoints the exact location within the region, asserting that the tomb is specifically in the city of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) and remains completely intact.
View Urdu Transliteration
"Hazrat Isa alaihis-salam Bait-ul-Lahm mein paida hue aur Bait-ul-Lahm aur Baldah Quds mein teen kos ka fasla hai aur Hazrat Isa alaihis-salam ki qabar Baldah Quds mein hai aur ab tak maujood hai"
Translation:
"Jesus (peace be upon him) was born in Bethlehem, and there is a distance of three kos between Bethlehem and the city of Quds (Jerusalem). And the grave of Hazrat Jesus (peace be upon him) is in the city of Quds and exists to this day."- (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 8, p. 299, Itmam-ul-Hujjah)
Below is the official English translation of this specification:
"Jesus peace be upon him was born in Bethlehem and there is a distance of three kos* between Bethlehem and the City of Quds. The tomb of Jesus, peace be upon him, is in the City of Quds and is still intact."
- (The Conclusive Argument, pp. 65-66, English translation of Itmam-ul-Hujjah)
1899: Kashmir, India
Eventually, Ghulam Ahmad abandoned the Middle Eastern locations altogether. In 1899, with the writing of his book Masih Hindustan Mein (Jesus in India), he settled on his final and most famous narrative. He concluded that Jesus survived the cross, travelled east towards India, lived to the grand age of 120, and was buried in the Roza Bal shrine in Srinagar, Kashmir. This remains the official stance of the Ahmadiyya movement today.
This geographical shuffling becomes highly problematic when we consider his overarching claims of divine backing. Throughout the 1890s, Ghulam Ahmad asserted that he was receiving constant revelations (ilhams) to guide his mission. In his book Nur-ul-Haq, printed in 1894 (the exact same year he was confidently placing the grave in Jerusalem), he claimed that God actively intervened to correct his mistakes and prevent him from slipping into error.
"I do not absolve myself of oversight or forgetfulness, but Allah does not allow me to remain in error for even a moment."
- (The Light of Truth [Nur-ul-Haq], p. 506)
Conclusion
The migrating tomb of Jesus presents a major dilemma for Ghulam Ahmad's broader claims. Moving the burial site from Galilee to Jerusalem, and finally settling on Kashmir, looks exactly like the trial and error of a man developing a historical theory, rather than a divinely appointed Mujaddid (reformer) receiving guidance from God.
Modern defenders attempt to brush these shifting locations off as innocent mistakes in his personal historical research (ijtihad) before God revealed the final truth about Kashmir. However, this defence falls apart when examining his tone. In 1894, he did not present the Jerusalem tomb as a mere historical guess; he confidently provided witness testimony and aggressively challenged his opponents to prove it was a forgery.
If his pen was truly guided by continuous divine revelation, and if God genuinely did not let him remain in error for even a single moment, it is impossible to explain why he officially published three entirely different locations for his most crucial theological claim. Instead of divine consistency, the timeline of his writings reveals a purely human evolution of thought.
This human evolution of thought is ultimately condemned by his own criteria. In his book Sat Bachan (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 10, p. 142), Ghulam Ahmad established a strict standard for judging a person's truthfulness, writing: "There is never a contradiction in the words of a wise and pure-hearted person. Yes, if someone is a madman and insane, or a hypocrite, then his words will be otherwise." He reiterated this in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya (Part 5), instructing his followers to remember well that the words of a liar will certainly contain contradictions.
By shifting the tomb from Galilee, to Jerusalem, and finally to Kashmir, he did not just make geographical errors. According to his own published standards, he committed the very contradictions that he argued were the unmistakable hallmark of a liar.
No comments:
Post a Comment